Controversial Engraver Eric Gill and His Everlasting 'Song of Songs'
10 mei 2021 
47 min. read

Controversial Engraver Eric Gill and His Everlasting 'Song of Songs'

Our current article is devoted to one of the most notorious British artists Eric Gill (1882-1940), a prominent sculptor and printmaker working on religious themes, which contrasted with his real life. The diaries of Gill, where he described the sexual abuse of his sisters, daughters Petra and Elizabeth, and even zoophilia cases, were published by Fiona MacCarthy in 1989. The life and work of this artist put our reasoning to the test. We have to decide if we can separate his personality from his oeuvres or not. In the latter case, Gill’s legacy apparently should be banned and expelled from museum expositions.

self portrait eric gill

Fig. 1. Self-portrait (

Three Kings Balthasar, Melchior, and Gaspar coming to newborn Christ Eric Gill

Fig. 2. Three Kings Balthasar, Melchior, and Gaspar coming to newborn Christ (illustration on p.4 of ‘Adeste Fideles, a Christmas Hymn’ (No 12 of the publications at the St Dominic’s Press, Sussex, 1916.) Woodcut on oriental paper,

Eric Gill artist

Fig. 3. The Madonna and Child with an angel: Madonna knitting, wood-engraved illustration to ‘Mary Sat A-Working’, a rhyme-sheet by H D C Pepler, published by the St

Dominic’s Press, Ditchling, Sussex, 1916 (

Eric Gill was the second of 13 kids in a family of the opera singer (the mother) and the minister of the Countess of Huntingdon’s Connexion, evangelical churches’ society (the father). When the family moved to Chichester in 1897, Gill began studying at the local Technical and Art School. Three years later, he shifted to London to receive training as an architect. Being unsatisfied with his architecture classes, Gill started attending stonemasonry courses at the Westminster Technical Institute and calligraphy courses at the Central School of Arts and Crafts. Eventually, he decided to focus on these two fields and gave up his architecture training in 1903. Throughout his life, Gill traveled in England and established masonry and typography workshops with his apprentices. The sources of his inspiration were works of Gauguin, Egyptian, Greek, and Indian statues. Brought up in a religious environment, the artist produced many sculptures and linocuts on biblical themes. He was distinguished as Royal Designer for Industry, which is the highest British award for designers, by the Royal Society of Arts. Died of lung cancer in 1940.

the striking cover of Poetry magazine by Eric Gill

Fig. 4. The striking cover of Poetry magazine by Gill (

The naked girl in the field at night by Eric Gill

Fig. 5. The naked girl in the field at night, illustration on p.17 of ‘Sonnets and Verses‘, by Enid Clay, no.25 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, 1925 (

Girl In the Bath by Eric Gill

Fig. 6. Girl In the Bath (Gill’s daughter Petra), 1922, Wood-engraving on oriental paper (

The Tennis Player by Eric Gill

Fig. 7. The Tennis Player, illustration on p.23 of ‘Wood-engravings’, No.44 of the publications of the St Dominic’s Press, Ditchling, Sussex, 1924 (

The Dancer by Eric Gill

Fig. 8. The Dancer, 1924 (

venus by Eric Gill

Fig. 9. Venus, wood-engraving, 1924 (

Girl sitting in leaves: Belle sauvage I by Eric Gill

Fig. 10. Girl sitting in leaves: Belle sauvage I, illustration on p.205 of ‘The Legion Book’, ed. Capt. H Cotton Minchin, published by Curwen Press, 1929 (

The thorn in the flesh by Eric Gill

Fig. 11. The thorn in the flesh, 1921 (

On The Tiles, by Eric Gill

Fig. 12. On The Tiles, probably Gill’s daughter, 1921 (

Eve, Gill’s daughter Petra

Fig. 13. Eve, Gill’s daughter Petra, 1926 (

Belle sauvage III by Eric Gill

Fig. 14. Belle sauvage III, variant of Physick 316, wood-engraved illustration. 1929 (

Hottentot by Eric Gill

Fig. 15. Hottentot (a term for the nomadic population of South Africa), 1920, Woodcut on oriental paper (

Sensual engravings of Gill with lovers having halos around their heads and especially the one depicting angels who hold the cloth above the embracing couple, remind of the famous short story “Moonlight” by Guy de Maupassant (1903). It tells of the tall, thin, and fanatic abbe Marignan, who regarded the world as logical and rational, and loved to ask himself why had the god create certain things. Everything in his system belonged to its’ place: the day was created for work, the night – for sleep, and so on. Among all the phenomena in the world Marignan couldn’t comprehend the existence of woman and considered her a vessel of sin. He had a pretty niece who laughed at his preaches. One day he learnt that she, whom he told of chastity, had a secret lover. He felt enraged. “To his priestly zeal against the mighty power of love was added the moral indignation of a father, of a teacher, of a keeper of souls, who has been deceived, robbed, played with by a child. He felt the egotistical sorrow that parents feel when their daughter announces that she has chosen a husband without them and in spite of their advice.”

In domiunium matris mea”, Volume of Eric Gill

Fig. 16. “In domiunium matris mea”, Volume of Eric Gill, ‘Engravings 1928-1933‘ (London: Faber & Faber, 1934). Two lovers, probably Adam and Eve, covered by angels (

Marignan felt so angry that day that he couldn’t even sleep the following night and decided to go for a walk. Standing by the opened door he was astonished by a poetic sight of the moonlight. “He opened his door to go out; but he stopped upon the threshold, surprised by such a splendor of moonlight as you seldom see. Endowed as he was with an exalted spirit, such a spirit as must have belonged to those dreamer-poets, the Fathers of the Church, he felt himself suddenly softened and moved by the grand and serene beauty of the pale-faced night. As he stepped into the open country he stopped to contemplate the whole plain, inundated by this caressing radiance, and drowned in the tender and languishing charm of the serene night. In chorus the frogs threw into space their short, metallic notes, and with the seduction of the moonlight, distant nightingales mingled that fitful music of theirs which brings no thoughts but dreams, a light and vibrant melody which seems attuned to kisses. The abbé continued his walk, his courage failing, he knew not why. He felt, as it were, enfeebled, and suddenly exhausted; he had a great desire to sit down, to pause right there and praise God in all His works.”

Divine Lovers by Eric Gill

Fig. 17. Divine Lovers, illustration on p.10 of ‘Wood-engravings‘, No.44 of the publications of the St Dominic’s Press, Ditchling, Sussex, 1924 (

“Since the night is destined for sleep, for unconsciousness, for repose, for forgetfulness of everything, why, then, make it more charming than the day, sweeter than dawns and sunsets? And this slow, seductive star, more poetical than the sun and so discreet, that it seems designed to light up things too delicate, too mysterious, for the great luminary,—why had it come to brighten all the shades? Why did not the sweetest of all songsters go to rest like the others? Why set himself to singing in the vaguely troubling dark? Why this half-veil over the world? Why these quiverings of the heart, this emotion of the soul, this languor of the body? Why this display of seductions which mankind never sees, since night brings sleep? For whom was this sublime spectacle intended, this flood of poetry poured from heaven to earth? The abbé did not understand it at all. But then, down there along the edge of the pasture appeared two shadows walking side by side under the arched roof of the trees all soaked in glittering mist. The man was the taller, and had his arm about his mistress’s neck; from time to time he kissed her on the forehead. They animated the lifeless landscape, which enveloped them, a divine frame made, as it were, expressly for them. They seemed these two, a single being, the being for whom this calm and silent night was destined; and they approached the priest like a living answer, the answer vouchsafed by his Master to his question.”

Lovers by Eric Gill

Fig. 18. Lovers, 1924 (

the song of songs by eric gill

Fig. 19. “I sleep, but my heart waketh; Hark! my beloved knocketh: ‘Open to me, my sister, my love, my dove, my undefiled; for my head is filled with dew, my locks with the drops of the night.‘” Illustration intended for ch. 5 of ‘The Song of Songs‘, No.31 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, Waltham St Lawrence, Berkshire, 1925 (

aristide maillol the song of songs

Fig. 20. “I have put off my coat; how shall I put it on? I have washed my feet; how shall I defile them?”. Illustration on ch. 5 of ‘The Song of Songs‘, No.31 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, Waltham St Lawrence, Berkshire, 1925

the watchmen aristide maillol

Fig. 21. “The watchmen that go about the city found me, they smote me, they wounded me; the keepers of the walls took away my mantle from me.” Illustration on ch. 5 of ‘The Song of Songs‘, No.31 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, Waltham St Lawrence, Berkshire, 1925

Ibi Dabo Tibi (I Will Give Thee My Love)

Fig. 22. Ibi Dabo Tibi (I Will Give Thee My Love), illustration on p.39 of ‘The Song of Songs‘, no.31 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, Berkshire. 1925 (

Our Bed Is All Of Flowers Eric Gill

Fig. 23. “Our Bed Is All Of Flowers”, 1927 (

the song of songs art by eric gill

Fig. 24. “Stay ye me with dainties, refresh me with apples; for I am love-sick.” Illustration for ch. 2 of “Song of Songs,” 1925 (

the song of the soul by eric gill

Fig. 25. The soul and the bridegroom, illustration on p.21 of Saint John-of-the-Cross’ ‘The Song of the Soul‘. 1927 (

Spirit and Flesh by Eric Gill

Fig. 26. Woodcut illustration to ‘Spirit and Flesh‘, a poem by Ananda K Coomaraswamy, printed by the St Dominic’s Press, Ditchling, Sussex, for private distribution, 1918 (

Approaching Dawn by Eric Gill

Fig. 27. Approaching Dawn; wood-engraved illustration on p.112 of Chaucer’s ‘Troilus and Criseyde’, no.50 of the publications of the Golden Cockerel Press, 1927 (

Gill’s reputation was above suspicion until the publication of the biographic research by Fiona MacCarthy. She revealed archives where the artist had listed the measurements of various parts of the bodies of his pubescent daughters. “Adjacent to those are his own measurements, and then, at the bottom, he writes his penis size, erect and flaccid. It is a powerful object. It very quickly tells the story. You can’t look at it and say: ‘He was a sculptor, of course, he was interested in measurements and form (Nathaniel Hepburn,” Indeed, the collection of Gill’s drafts at the site of the British Museum contains dozens of the erected and flaccid penis’ depictions, often with measurements as in architect blueprints. Gill’s daughter Petra denoted this obsession with flesh as “endless curiosity about sex,” saying that they took it for granted, so we can’t tell now how much traumatic this interaction was. They married father’s apprentices afterward. In the case of Gill, there were at least two reasons that provoked his erotic deviations.

Gill’s draft of male genitalia

Fig. 28. Gill’s draft of male genitalia (

Drawing of female genitalia

Fig. 29. Drawing of female genitalia (

Male genitalia by Eric Gill

Fig. 30, Male genitalia (

The Bird by Eric Gill

Fig. 31. “The Bird” (

Vulva drawing by Eric Gill

Fig. 32. Vulva drawing (

Growing phallus by Eric Gill

Fig. 33. Growing phallus (

The draft of flaccid and erected penis by Eric Gill

Fig. 34. The draft of flaccid and erected penis (

Penis at different angles by Eric Gill

Fig. 35. Penis at different angles (

Firstly, Gill’s “curiosity about sex” rooted deeply in his nature, was additively stimulated by the specificity of his artistic field, which involves, for instance, nude posing. Secondly, religious books, which were a matter of Gill’s work, undoubtedly imply eroticism the artist was aware of. The closest culture parallel to his affairs can be found in the Bible, namely, in the story of Lot and his daughters, who also took their incestuous intercourse for granted, as they thought there weren’t any other men on earth anymore. Both Old and New Testaments use sensual metaphors. In the New Testament, Christ is compared to the groom while the church is the bride. The Old Testament contains the famous hymn of sensuality, entitled “Song of Songs,” which Gill, unsurprisingly, illustrated (fig. 19-25).

Penis lying on the stomach by Eric Gill

Fig. 36. Penis lying on the stomach (

Draft of a penis by Eric Gill

Fig. 37. Draft of a penis (

Red Indian Gala Dress by Eric Gill

Fig. 38. “Red Indian Gala Dress” draft (

Double Penetration by Eric Gill

Fig. 39. Double Penetration, Cairo, 1939 (

On a Ship by Eric Gill

Fig. 40. “On a Ship” (Steward: ‘Did you ring?’),

Draft of a coupling couple by Eric Gill

Fig. 41. Draft of a coupling couple (

Copulating couple by Eric Gill

Fig. 42. Copulating couple (

Triton with erected penis by Eric Gill

Fig. 43. Triton with erected penis (

Woman, probably Eve, satisfying herself on a tree branch

Fig. 44. Woman, probably Eve, satisfying herself on a tree branch (

Woman with lustful animals by Eric Gill

Fig. 45. Woman with lustful animals (

Panel over door of Kitchino at Haddon Hall

Fig. 46. Panel over door of Kitchino at Haddon Hall (

Intercourse close-up drawn from a photograph by Eric gill

Fig. 47. Intercourse close-up drawn from a photograph (

Naked masturbating woman by Eric Gill

Fig. 48. Naked masturbating woman (

Naked woman with a genitalia-shaped skirt by Eric Gill

Fig. 49. Naked woman with a genitalia-shaped skirt (

Couple making love in a variation of a frog pose

Fig. 50. Couple making love in a variation of a frog pose, Cairo, 1939 (

Male and female genitalia by Eric Gill

Fig. 51. Male and female genitalia (

To look or not to look at the works of Eric Gill is the question that requires your personal answer. Yet, we can give you another cultural parallel to this artist. The personality of Gill was, as we think, the most precisely portrayed by Agostino Carracci several centuries before Gill was born. We speak of his enigmatic engraving “The Satyr Mason” from the “Lascivie” series, which was the theme of one of our previous articles. The man who was literally trained as a mason and combined his educational activities of the workshops’ founder with “endless curiosity about sex,” so distinguishing for the ancient satyrs, seems to be a weird manifestation of the Renaissance picture in the real world.

Satyr Mason by Agostino Carracci

Fig. 52. “Satyr Mason” by Agostino Carracci, the 1590s (

Click HERE for more satyrs as portrayed in the sensual engravings of Agostino Carracci…!!


We’re curious to know your thoughts on this article, so leave your reaction in the comment box below….!!

About the author
Darya is a philologist who lives and works in Saint-Petersburg, Russia. She is specialized in Russian literature.


on 10 May 2021

A favorite artist, a true master of the line. His work is unparalleled and has inspired many. His endless curiosity about sex mixed with biblical themes is not contradictory. Life is one. You do not cut a man's ahead, rip the heart from the chest and castrate him, and say, "Voila! We have separated the spirit from the flesh!" To do so kills the individual. We have enough eunuchs around already, no need for more. Should EG's work be banned? Excellent question, and easy to answer; first, there is no concrete proof, beyond reasonable doubt, that EG was sexually abusing his daughters or sisters. It's at best conjecture. Throw a knife on the ground by a pool of blood and most will assume that the knife was the instrument used in the murder. Was there even a murder? Often not. There is no "beyond reasonable doubt" proof that can be used to condemn EG. It is obvious from his sketches of the penis that he was observing himself. As for the vulvas, well, he didn't have one himself, so he observed other bodies. If they were the bodies of his daughters, sisters, or other women, even prostitutes, it's up for discussion. If his daughters, did it amount to pedophilia? I'm sure for many people it would. But that too could be a very long discussion, and many would have to agree on disagreeing. Now, the art itself: should it be banned because it is suspected that EG was a pedophile? Everyone's mileage varies. For the religious fanatic (the closeted pedophile himself, the repressed homosexual, lesbian, sexually self-castrated man or woman of the cloth, etc.) it would certainly be so. But is it really so? Then, if indeed banned, where does it stop? Shall we also ban all the other existing artwork that depict nudity, sexual intercourse, or artists that used prostitutes as models, and we all know who they are, and get rid of the "filth" as it is often referred to as, and allow nothing else but what the "morally clean" approve of? God forbid! ------ if there is a God, that is, ------- and we would have to wonder, what about all the other gods, or God's, etc., who indulged in sex. There was a time when even Michelangelo's nudes were veiled. In some cases, paintings were been painted over, all pudenda hidden from lustful eyes. Etc. Stupidity and obscurantism at its best, the mores of the world at its worst. Judeo-Christian tradition has vilified "the flesh" for milena. Other cultures have praised it, celebrated it and seen it as Life itself. Art has a life of its own. From primitive cave wall art to EG, from African fertility Lobi stattuetes to Indian temple sculptures, from Sheela na gig depictions to this day present in churches (fig. 46 in this article,) to Picasso, to Egon Schiele, Thai amulets, and a myriad other objects, the human body and what guarantees the continuity of the species, sex, has been an object of fascination and delight. Let it be so, and let those unable of unwilling to appreciate it look away. And we have EG to thank for Gill Sans too, a font that is also a delight to use. So, no, his work should not be banned, the same way that many actors (Kevin Spacey, for example, comes to mind,) shouldn't have been #me.too banned because some people complained they made inappropriate advances. Heck, it's time people take responsibility for their actions and look elsewhere or step away. Another very long discussion.



on 10 May 2021

It's a slippery topic, indeed. Accusations of this kind remain popular since the biblical Joseph's story (since we've appeared on the earth I guess). Very effective manipulation, invincible as.... well, as death, I think. We can't solve this problem just as we can't get rid of our physical death. However, the victory over death seems now more possible than control over human hypocrisy. Harassment scandals are the modern hydra. Even death can't save a person from accusations, and the posthumous cancel is an old practice. However, cancels can also be 'cancelled'. Ars longa vita brevis they say. So true art can survive its' ban.



on 02 Sep 2021

the figures arent showing for me.

Place comment

Secrets revealed of an erotic art genius Find out in our free E-Book